翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Hostice (Šumperk District)
・ Hostie
・ Hostile (disambiguation)
・ Hostile Action Service Medal
・ Hostile Advances
・ Hostile Ambient Takeover
・ Hostile architecture
・ Hostile Attribution Bias
・ Hostile City Showdown
・ Hostile dependency
・ Hostile Environment
・ Hostile Gospel
・ Hostile Gospel (disambiguation)
・ Hostile Guns
・ Hostile Makeover
Hostile media effect
・ Hostile Moments
・ Hostile prejudice
・ Hostile Recordings
・ Hostile Takeover (album)
・ Hostile Takeover Trilogy
・ Hostile Waters
・ Hostile Waters (book)
・ Hostile Waters (film)
・ Hostile Whirlwinds
・ Hostile Witness
・ Hostile witness
・ Hostile work environment
・ Hostilia (gens)
・ Hostilian


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Hostile media effect : ウィキペディア英語版
Hostile media effect
The hostile media effect, originally deemed the hostile media phenomenon and sometimes called hostile media perception, is a perceptual theory of mass communication that refers to the finding that people with strong biases toward an issue (partisans) perceive media coverage as biased against their opinions, regardless of the reality. Proponents of the hostile media effect argue that this finding cannot be attributed to the presence of bias in the news reports, since partisans from opposing sides of an issue perceive the same coverage differently.〔Vallone, R.P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M.R. (1985). (The hostile media phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the "Beirut Massacre". ) ''Journal of Personality and Social Psychology'', 49, 577-585. (summary ).〕 The hostile media effect illustrates notions of the active media audience, in demonstrating that audiences do not passively receive media content but instead selectively interpret it in light of their own values and predispositions. Despite some journalists' best intentions to report news in a fair and objective way, partisans are motivated to see neutral content as harboring a hostile bias. The phenomenon was first proposed and studied experimentally by Robert Vallone, Lee Ross and Mark Lepper.〔〔Vallone, R.E., Lepper, M.R., & Ross, L. (1981). Perceptions of media bias in the 1980 presidential election. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University. As cited in Vallone, Ross & Lepper, 1985.〕
==Studies==
In 1982, the first major study of this phenomenon was undertaken;〔 pro-Palestinian students and pro-Israeli students at Stanford University were shown the same news filmstrips pertaining to the then-recent Sabra and Shatila massacre of Palestinian refugees by Christian Lebanese militia fighters abetted by the Israeli army in Beirut during the Lebanese Civil War. On a number of objective measures, both sides found that these identical news clips were slanted in favor of the other side. Pro-Israeli students reported seeing more anti-Israel references and fewer favorable references to Israel in the news report and pro-Palestinian students reported seeing more anti-Palestinian references, and so on. Both sides said a neutral observer would have a more negative view of their side from viewing the clips, and that the media would have excused the other side where it blamed their side.
Subsequent studies have found hostile media effects related to other political conflicts, such as strife in Bosnia 〔Matheson, K. & Dursun, S. (2001). (Social identity precursors to the hostile media phenomenon: Partisan perceptions of coverage of the Bosnian conflict ) ''Group Processes and Intergroup Relations'', 4, 117-126.〕 and in U.S. presidential elections, as well as in other areas, such as media coverage of the South Korean National Security Act, the 1997 United Parcel Service Teamsters strike, genetically modified food, and sports.
This effect is interesting to psychologists because it appears to be a reversal of the otherwise pervasive effects of confirmation bias: in this area, people seem to pay more attention to information that ''contradicts'' rather than supports their existing views. This is an example of disconfirmation bias.
An oft-cited forerunner to Vallone's et al. study was conducted by Albert Hastorf and Hadley Cantril in 1954. Princeton and Dartmouth students were shown a filmstrip of a controversial Princeton-Dartmouth football game. Asked to count the number of infractions committed by both sides, students at both universities "saw" many more infractions committed by the opposing side, in addition to making different generalizations about the game. Hastorf and Cantril concluded that "there is no such 'thing' as a 'game' existing 'out there' in its own right which people merely 'observe.' ... For the 'thing' simply is ''not'' the same for different people whether the 'thing' is a football game, a presidential candidate, Communism, or spinach."〔Hastorf & Cantril (1954), pp. 132-133. Emphasis as in original.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Hostile media effect」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.